Comments on: Hacktivisme & Hacktivist http://winnuayi.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/hacktivisme-hacktivist/ ngobrolin Apa Aja Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:04:55 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Winnu Ayi http://winnuayi.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/hacktivisme-hacktivist/#comment-141 Winnu Ayi Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:39:05 +0000 http://winnuayi.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-141 I agree if they (red: gov, rep, white collar) don't care. Just their admins do. This action isn't interested enough for them rather than what they've done to enrich themselves. Finding some proof perhaps is a good idea but hacker who revealed it won't show himself or will be jailed. He3. As if our president loves technology like Obama, and Information Technology is an important issue, hacktivism will be heard by our beloved government. Nice comment, pals! I agree if they (red: gov, rep, white collar) don’t care. Just their admins do. This action isn’t interested enough for them rather than what they’ve done to enrich themselves.

Finding some proof perhaps is a good idea but hacker who revealed it won’t show himself or will be jailed. He3. As if our president loves technology like Obama, and Information Technology is an important issue, hacktivism will be heard by our beloved government.

Nice comment, pals!

]]> By: Kunderemp http://winnuayi.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/hacktivisme-hacktivist/#comment-140 Kunderemp Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:37:21 +0000 http://winnuayi.wordpress.com/?p=158#comment-140 No, it is not. Most of web-defacer and dos attacker were just script-kiddies and just use the moment as proof that their crime can be used for good thing. In the real world, nobody care but the network and website administration. The owner of the website themselves ( the government, the representatives, the white collar company who pollute air and river ) would not even care. Press would only report 'the activity' and not 'the message'. It would not add any value. It would be better if they hack into the object's internal network, find some proof which may work on the court against those crooks, and bring the case to the press, expose the crime. That would be the one I call Hacktivism. No, it is not. Most of web-defacer and dos attacker were just script-kiddies and just use the moment as proof that their crime can be used for good thing.

In the real world, nobody care but the network and website administration. The owner of the website themselves ( the government, the representatives, the white collar company who pollute air and river ) would not even care.

Press would only report ‘the activity’ and not ‘the message’. It would not add any value.

It would be better if they hack into the object’s internal network, find some proof which may work on the court against those crooks, and bring the case to the press, expose the crime. That would be the one I call Hacktivism.

]]>